The soft pencils down date has passed. I’m to submit a report soon. I thought I’d blog one first 😉
Here’s the complete package list that I’ve worked on, with their current statuses. There is a huge dependency chain here. Most of the packages require their build deps to be packaged first.
| Package | Status |
|---|---|
| Aeskulap | Packaged |
| ANTs | Spec in progress. Waiting on ITK. |
| bio-formats | Spec in progress. Waiting on omero |
| bioimagexd | Spec in progress |
| Conquest | Patched makefile to add support for different data bases. Spec in progress |
| dcm4che | Review in progress |
| dcm4che-test | Packaged. Was required for dcm4che |
| elmer-eio | Needs reviewer |
| elmer-fem | Needs reviewer |
| elmer-elmergrid | Needs reviewer |
| elmer-hutiter | Needs reviewer |
| elmer-matc | Needs reviewer |
| elmer-meshgen2d | Needs reviewer |
| fiji | Bad license. Review closed WONTFIX |
| freediams | Review in progress |
| FreeMat | Review in progress |
| freemedforms | Packaged |
| Ginkgo-CADx | Needs reviewer |
| gnumed | Packaged |
| GoFigure2 | Needs reviewer |
| klt | Packaged. Build dep for VXL |
| kradview | Needs reviewer |
| ledgersmb | |
| libtpcimgio | Packaged. Build dep for xmedcon |
| libtpcmisc | Packaged. Build dep for xmedcon |
| mayam | Waiting on dcm4che |
| metis | Bad License. Review closed WONTFIX |
| mood-track | Ruby package. I got no clue on how to do this. Later |
| nifticlib | Packaged. Build dep for xmedcon |
| omero | Spec in progress. In dialogue with upstream |
| o-palm | Needs reviewer |
| opendental | Mono package. Later |
| openemr | Needs reviewer. Took over review from Rakesh |
| OpenHRE | Spec in progress |
| OpenNL | Packaged. Build dep for vmtk |
| OSGI-bundle-ant-task | Packaged. Build dep for bio-formats |
| python-hl7 | Packaged |
| tetgen | Review in progress. Probably a WONTFIX. Bad license |
| toothchart | Packaged |
| vmtk | In review. Depends on vxl |
| xmedcon | Packaged |
Summary:
Packaged: 13
In review (or needs reviewer): 16
Wasted: 2
The rest are still in progress: Either waiting for a build dependency to be approved, or in dialogue with upstream over the build process.
I’ve done a couple of reviews as well, swaps etc. but since they aren’t all fedora-medical related, I won’t include them here.
EDIT- Aug 21: Added links to bug reports needing reviewer 😉
Ankur's Tech blog 
Maybe you should place link the review bug on the fedora bugzilla, this could maybe help people to comment on it ( ie, lower the barrier for spontaneous contribution ) ?
Updated post 🙂